Settembre 2, 2014
tastefullyoffensive:

[@sallystrange]

With Dirac notation:
|Guy’s intent> = 1/√2 (|Joking> + |Not Joking>)

tastefullyoffensive:

[@sallystrange]

With Dirac notation:

|Guy’s intent> = 1/√2 (|Joking> + |Not Joking>)

(Fonte: bedabug, via the-fried-air)

Settembre 1, 2014

(Fonte: ilmiofilo, via lasimple)

Settembre 1, 2014

formedivita:

In apparente controtendenza con il resto dell’universo, la vita crea un ordine temporaneo ed in ciò si differenzia nettamente da tutto ciò che la circonda.

A parte la cristallizzazione (su piccola scala) e il campo gravitazionale (su larga scala).

Settembre 1, 2014
"Che le coppie gay possano adottare un figlio dovrebbe stabilirlo una legge dello Stato, non una decisione della magistratura che, presa da una sindrome di supplenza onnipotente, vuole interpretare, forzare, piegare una legge che non c’è. O che non c’è ancora, perché attualmente sono in discussione molte ipotesi per regolare la convivenza stabile tra coppie dello stesso sesso per riconoscere a queste ultime diritti ancora calpestati. Ma anche nella più «avanzata» tra queste ipotesi l’adozione di un figlio è ancora materia controversa. Deciderà il Parlamento, nella sua sovranità legislativa. Invece ieri un magistrato ha deciso al posto del Parlamento, deliberando a favore del sì all’adozione. Montesquieu avrebbe qualcosa da eccepire su questa invadenza del potere giudiziario che si arroga la titolarità del potere legislativo. (…) la magistratura che si sostituisce alla politica e alla sua incapacità di legiferare dovrebbe preoccupare chiunque, a prescindere dal merito delle singole questioni. Possibile che debba essere una sentenza a stabilire se in un ospedale debbano essere somministrati gli intrugli di Stamina? O che sia una sentenza a fissare le regole della fecondazione eterologa?"

(via politicamentecorretto)

——-

La Magistratura in Italia può tutto..

(via falcemartello)

Non riuscirò mai a capire, né a condividere, il punto di vista di qualcuno che vuole stabilire delle leggi su cosa possono o non possono fare due persone che si amano. Come è  possibile che l’orientamento sessuale di due persone che scelgono di stare insieme e avere dei figli sia più importante della loro capacità di amare e trasmettere amore? 

Perché insistere sul valore della famiglia tradizionale quando il mondo è pieno di persone di merda nate e/o cresciute da coppie etero? 

(via rita—lin)

E poi se “la magistratura che si sostituisce alla politica e alla sua incapacità di legiferare” non vedo perché le persone dovrebbero rinunciare ai loro diritti solo perché il parlamento latita: ricordiamoci che abbiamo una Costutuzione e nella sua prima parte ci dovrebbe guidare in tutte le questioni su cui il parlamento non ha ancora legiferato (in questo caso sopratutto l’Articolo 3).

(Fonte: corriere.it, via madonnaliberaprofessionista)

Agosto 31, 2014

firewalker:

noneun:

firewalker:

la naturalità è un concetto enormemente sopravvalutato

O meglio le si attribuiscono accezioni che non le competono, come ad esempio quella di salutare, non velenoso, ecocompatibile, giusto, non violento, buono e gustoso.

Sono molto più estremista di così. Naturale e artificiale sono due parole senza significato, concetti dividenti che non rispecchiano la complessità del mondo naturale elevando l’uomo a qualcosa al di fuori della natura stessa

Sono perfettamente d’accordo. Mi riferivo infatti all’aspetto -direi quasi divertente- relativo agli sforzi che l’uomo compie per attribuire qualità ove non ce ne sono (per esempio la natura è amorale) e, come giustamente sottolinei tu, l’uomo non è al di sopra del regno animale, ma ne fa parte. C’è chi ci vorrebbe elevati perché senzienti, ma forse è stata questa presunzione di superiorità a farci percepire l’ambiente come un mero giacimento di risorse a nostro uso e consumo.

Agosto 30, 2014

spassky:

phoeni-xx:

sixpenceee:

Created by Croatian-Austrian collective Numen/For UseString Prototype is a design for an inflatable volume containing a network of cables that can be explored similar to a jungle gym. 

what happens when you fall? do you get clotheslined 65 times or 66?

Un’enorme macchina per le tagliatelle! Umane! Voglio entrarci ieri!

The Cube.

Agosto 30, 2014
iceageiscoming:

gigiopix:

gnumlab:

E se sei coglione?

Cosa sono i digiunisti ? Esistono veramente ? In cosa credono? Che aspettativa media di vita hanno ?
Questi post ti fanno venir voglia di tornare all’universita’ per studiare antropologia culturale.

Mi dispiace deluderti ma non si studiano queste cose. Forse a Psichiatria.

I digiunisti sarebbero i famosi breathariani? Robe che o sono ciarlatani o viva Darwin.

iceageiscoming:

gigiopix:

gnumlab:

E se sei coglione?

Cosa sono i digiunisti ? Esistono veramente ? In cosa credono? Che aspettativa media di vita hanno ?

Questi post ti fanno venir voglia di tornare all’universita’ per studiare antropologia culturale.

Mi dispiace deluderti ma non si studiano queste cose. Forse a Psichiatria.

I digiunisti sarebbero i famosi breathariani? Robe che o sono ciarlatani o viva Darwin.

Agosto 30, 2014

firewalker:

la naturalità è un concetto enormemente sopravvalutato

O meglio le si attribuiscono accezioni che non le competono, come ad esempio quella di salutare, non velenoso, ecocompatibile, giusto, non violento, buono e gustoso.

Agosto 30, 2014
chikaderp:

wildunicornherd:

thinksquad:

Here is a Science fair project presented by a girl in a secondary school in Sussex . In it she took filtered water and divided it into two parts. The first part she heated to boiling in a pan on the stove, and the second part she heated to boiling in a microwave. Then after cooling she used the water to water two identical plants to see if there would be any difference in the growth between the normal boiled water and the water boiled in a microwave. She was thinking that the structure or energy of the water may be compromised by microwave. As it turned out, even she was amazed at the difference, after the experiment which was repeated by her class mates a number of times and had the same result.
It has been known for some years that the problem with microwaved anything is not the radiation people used to worry about, it’s how it corrupts the DNA in the food so the body can not recognize it.
Microwaves don’t work different ways on different substances. Whatever you put into the microwave suffers the same destructive process. Microwaves agitate the molecules to move faster and faster. This movement causes friction which denatures the original make-up of the substance. It results in destroyed vitamins, minerals, proteins and generates the new stuff called radiolytic compounds, things that are not found in nature.
So the body wraps it in fat cells to protect itself from the dead food or it eliminates it fast. Think of all the Mothers heating up milk in these ‘Safe’ appliances. What about the nurse in Canada that warmed up blood for a transfusion patient and accidentally killed him when the blood went in dead. But the makers say it’s safe. But proof is in the pictures of living plants dying!

NO, YOU PIG-IGNORANT ASSWIPES.
SOME KID’S CLASS PROJECT IS NOT REAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. YOU’VE HEARD OF “DOUBLE BLIND”, RIGHT? CALL ME WHEN IT’S PUBLISHED IN NATURE.

the structure or energy of the water

what the fuck does that even mean you realize that a water molecule is made up of three fucking atoms and if you rearrange it it isn’t water anymore and you would fucking notice

the problem with microwaved anything is not the radiation people used to worry about

Here is a handy diagram I drew of all the different types of radiation:

Microwaves != nuclear reactors, so calm your tits.

it’s how it corrupts the DNA in the food so the body can not recognize it

…do you understand what DNA is and how eating works? DNA is a jumble of protein in the middle of each cell and it tells the cells in that particular organism how to make more cells. Your body does not care about whether your food has any DNA in it or not. The chemicals it cares about are things like vitamins and sugars, as well as inorganic shit like salt.
(You can denature DNA by heating it or using chemicals like urea. It is like what happens when you fry an egg, which is basically a big glob of protein—the strands break apart and it looks like tiny white strings. Very cool.)

Microwaves agitate the molecules to move faster and faster.

I…just…that is the fucking definition of heat, whether you’re heating something over a flame or in a microwave or using the Sun. The difference is that microwaves mostly affect the water molecules in your food and they don’t need to use as much heat. Water boils at 100°C, which is just about as hot as water can get before it just turns into steam; but that’s like the lowest setting on your oven. Oven- or stove-cooked food tastes different partly because it uses higher temperatures and partly because heat is transferred in a different way.

This movement causes friction

That’s not what friction is.

It results in destroyed vitamins, minerals, proteins and generates the new stuff called radiolytic compounds, things that are not found in nature.

Let’s take these one at a time.
Vitamins are classified as water-soluble or fat-soluble. So cooking things in water will dissolve the water-soluble vitamins (C and all the B’s). Just plain heat doesn’t do that, so microwaving veggies—which keeps the water in—is actually a healthier option.
Proteins: Breaking the chemical bonds in proteins (denaturing) is a part of any cooking. However, denatured protein is still nutritious—that’s why you can meet your protein intake with foods like fried eggs and baked chicken.
Minerals are just chemical elements, like off the periodic table—sodium, iron, potassium. (Vitamins and proteins are very complex combinations of elements.)
Which brings me to the “radiolytic compound” bullshit. When you talk about breaking apart, say, iron—you’re talking about breaking down the iron atoms themselves. Which is a whole lot different than breaking the bonds between atoms. It takes hella radiation. You need shit like gamma rays—the OOOH SCARY NUCULAR radiation—which we’ve already established do not come from your microwave.

things that are not found in nature

What the shit does that even mean? You all know radioactive elements occur in nature, right? In rocks and also in living cells. That’s right, you have this radioactive kind of carbon INSIDE YOU. You get it by eating those delicious plants. We can tell how long ago something died by how much of it is left.
Tons of shit that occurs naturally is horribly bad for you. And tons of shit that never existed until we cooked it up is great for you—like the chemical compounds in a lot of medications.
PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE THIS SHIT ARE WHY CHILDHOOD DISEASES THAT CAUSED SERIOUS ILLNESSES AND/OR DEATH THAT WE NEARLY ERADICATED WITH VACCINES ARE NOW COMING BACK AND WHY CONSPIRACY THEORIST TWATS ARE ASKING CITY COUNCIL NOT TO FLUORIDATE THE WATER AND WHY GLOBAL WARMING WILL WRECK OUR FUCKING PLANET.
LERN 2 SCIENCE. Think before you reblog. And microwave your veggies.

This was incredibly amusing to read. Thank you so much for sciencing.


L’avrei detto con meno parolacce ma ha perfettamente ragione. Soprattutto quando dice: “PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE THIS SHIT ARE WHY CHILDHOOD DISEASES THAT CAUSED SERIOUS ILLNESSES AND/OR DEATH THAT WE NEARLY ERADICATED WITH VACCINES ARE NOW COMING BACK AND WHY CONSPIRACY THEORIST TWATS ARE ASKING CITY COUNCIL NOT TO FLUORIDATE THE WATER AND WHY GLOBAL WARMING WILL WRECK OUR FUCKING PLANET.”

chikaderp:

wildunicornherd:

thinksquad:

Here is a Science fair project presented by a girl in a secondary school in Sussex . In it she took filtered water and divided it into two parts. The first part she heated to boiling in a pan on the stove, and the second part she heated to boiling in a microwave. Then after cooling she used the water to water two identical plants to see if there would be any difference in the growth between the normal boiled water and the water boiled in a microwave. She was thinking that the structure or energy of the water may be compromised by microwave. As it turned out, even she was amazed at the difference, after the experiment which was repeated by her class mates a number of times and had the same result.

It has been known for some years that the problem with microwaved anything is not the radiation people used to worry about, it’s how it corrupts the DNA in the food so the body can not recognize it.

Microwaves don’t work different ways on different substances. Whatever you put into the microwave suffers the same destructive process. Microwaves agitate the molecules to move faster and faster. This movement causes friction which denatures the original make-up of the substance. It results in destroyed vitamins, minerals, proteins and generates the new stuff called radiolytic compounds, things that are not found in nature.

So the body wraps it in fat cells to protect itself from the dead food or it eliminates it fast. Think of all the Mothers heating up milk in these ‘Safe’ appliances. What about the nurse in Canada that warmed up blood for a transfusion patient and accidentally killed him when the blood went in dead. But the makers say it’s safe. But proof is in the pictures of living plants dying!

NO, YOU PIG-IGNORANT ASSWIPES.

SOME KID’S CLASS PROJECT IS NOT REAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. YOU’VE HEARD OF “DOUBLE BLIND”, RIGHT? CALL ME WHEN IT’S PUBLISHED IN NATURE.

the structure or energy of the water

what the fuck does that even mean you realize that a water molecule is made up of three fucking atoms and if you rearrange it it isn’t water anymore and you would fucking notice

the problem with microwaved anything is not the radiation people used to worry about

Here is a handy diagram I drew of all the different types of radiation:

The Electromagnetic Spectrum Cheat Sheet

Microwaves != nuclear reactors, so calm your tits.

it’s how it corrupts the DNA in the food so the body can not recognize it

…do you understand what DNA is and how eating works? DNA is a jumble of protein in the middle of each cell and it tells the cells in that particular organism how to make more cells. Your body does not care about whether your food has any DNA in it or not. The chemicals it cares about are things like vitamins and sugars, as well as inorganic shit like salt.

(You can denature DNA by heating it or using chemicals like urea. It is like what happens when you fry an egg, which is basically a big glob of protein—the strands break apart and it looks like tiny white strings. Very cool.)

Microwaves agitate the molecules to move faster and faster.

I…just…that is the fucking definition of heat, whether you’re heating something over a flame or in a microwave or using the Sun. The difference is that microwaves mostly affect the water molecules in your food and they don’t need to use as much heat. Water boils at 100°C, which is just about as hot as water can get before it just turns into steam; but that’s like the lowest setting on your oven. Oven- or stove-cooked food tastes different partly because it uses higher temperatures and partly because heat is transferred in a different way.

This movement causes friction

That’s not what friction is.

It results in destroyed vitamins, minerals, proteins and generates the new stuff called radiolytic compounds, things that are not found in nature.

Let’s take these one at a time.

  • Vitamins are classified as water-soluble or fat-soluble. So cooking things in water will dissolve the water-soluble vitamins (C and all the B’s). Just plain heat doesn’t do that, so microwaving veggies—which keeps the water in—is actually a healthier option.
  • Proteins: Breaking the chemical bonds in proteins (denaturing) is a part of any cooking. However, denatured protein is still nutritious—that’s why you can meet your protein intake with foods like fried eggs and baked chicken.
  • Minerals are just chemical elements, like off the periodic table—sodium, iron, potassium. (Vitamins and proteins are very complex combinations of elements.)

Which brings me to the “radiolytic compound” bullshit. When you talk about breaking apart, say, iron—you’re talking about breaking down the iron atoms themselves. Which is a whole lot different than breaking the bonds between atoms. It takes hella radiation. You need shit like gamma rays—the OOOH SCARY NUCULAR radiation—which we’ve already established do not come from your microwave.

things that are not found in nature

What the shit does that even mean? You all know radioactive elements occur in nature, right? In rocks and also in living cells. That’s right, you have this radioactive kind of carbon INSIDE YOU. You get it by eating those delicious plants. We can tell how long ago something died by how much of it is left.

Tons of shit that occurs naturally is horribly bad for you. And tons of shit that never existed until we cooked it up is great for you—like the chemical compounds in a lot of medications.

PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE THIS SHIT ARE WHY CHILDHOOD DISEASES THAT CAUSED SERIOUS ILLNESSES AND/OR DEATH THAT WE NEARLY ERADICATED WITH VACCINES ARE NOW COMING BACK AND WHY CONSPIRACY THEORIST TWATS ARE ASKING CITY COUNCIL NOT TO FLUORIDATE THE WATER AND WHY GLOBAL WARMING WILL WRECK OUR FUCKING PLANET.

LERN 2 SCIENCE. Think before you reblog. And microwave your veggies.

This was incredibly amusing to read. Thank you so much for sciencing.

L’avrei detto con meno parolacce ma ha perfettamente ragione. Soprattutto quando dice: “PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE THIS SHIT ARE WHY CHILDHOOD DISEASES THAT CAUSED SERIOUS ILLNESSES AND/OR DEATH THAT WE NEARLY ERADICATED WITH VACCINES ARE NOW COMING BACK AND WHY CONSPIRACY THEORIST TWATS ARE ASKING CITY COUNCIL NOT TO FLUORIDATE THE WATER AND WHY GLOBAL WARMING WILL WRECK OUR FUCKING PLANET.”

(via 3nding)

Agosto 29, 2014
Internazionale » La prima adozione per una coppia gay in Italia

(Fonte: 3nding)

Agosto 29, 2014

sabrinaonmymind:

più o meno tutte le mie cene

dicasi “condivisione”.

(Fonte: lolgifs.net)

Agosto 29, 2014

emmawatsonsdaily:

One of the reasons why Emma Watson is one of the best female role-models of our time. She’s so underrated.

(via iceageiscoming)

Agosto 29, 2014
spaam:

kon-igi:

Dott. Pietro La Monaca, Medico Vegano (che spopola su facebook, ovviamente)
Livello di sconforto: Chernobyl.
(Grazie lasbronzaconsapevole)

chissà quanti polipeptidi ci vengono fuori con 3 etti di amatriciana. Se poi ci fate pure la scarpetta, sai che traffico di polipeptidi. 

Dai miei ricordi di chimica organica direi che di polipeptidi siamo pieni perché sono semplicemente le catene di amminoacidi che formano le proteine… però quando ha parlato alla fine della salute dei bambini, signora mia, mi sono quasi convinto…

spaam:

kon-igi:

Dott. Pietro La Monaca, Medico Vegano (che spopola su facebook, ovviamente)

Livello di sconforto: Chernobyl.

(Grazie lasbronzaconsapevole)

chissà quanti polipeptidi ci vengono fuori con 3 etti di amatriciana. Se poi ci fate pure la scarpetta, sai che traffico di polipeptidi. 

Dai miei ricordi di chimica organica direi che di polipeptidi siamo pieni perché sono semplicemente le catene di amminoacidi che formano le proteine… però quando ha parlato alla fine della salute dei bambini, signora mia, mi sono quasi convinto…

Agosto 28, 2014

heresiae:

gookgod:

cameoamalthea:

the-dragonblades-shadow:

sizvideos:

Video

//This began the rise of Aperture Science.

BUT GUYS!

What if we used this to coat foam cosplay weapons and armor? 

what if i sprayed this on my dick while i was hard. i would have the eternal wood

no doubt somebody would think about that

love science. love tumblr.

(via 3nding)

Agosto 28, 2014
proud-atheist:

I work with a lot of religious people in the office. They sport crosses and other things in their workspace so I thought I would do the same. Here is the new addition to my workspace:http://proud-atheist.tumblr.com

proud-atheist:

I work with a lot of religious people in the office. They sport crosses and other things in their workspace so I thought I would do the same. Here is the new addition to my workspace:
http://proud-atheist.tumblr.com

Post piaciuti su Tumblr: Altri post piaciuti »